Legal Opinion
International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Hanke
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided May 8, 1950No. 309PublishedCited by 201 opinions
1Judgment of the CourtJustice Frankfurter
These two cases raise the same issues and are therefore disposed of in a single opinion. The question is this: Does the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution bar a State from use of the injunction to prohibit the picketing of a business conducted by the owner himself without employees in order to secure compliance by him with a demand to become a union shop?
In No. 309, respondents A. E. Hanke and his three sons, as copartners, engaged in the business of repairing automobiles, dispensing gasoline and automobile accessories, and selling used automobiles in Seattle. They conducted their…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
- Giboney v. Empire Storage & Ice Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Armour & Co. v. WantockSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Prentis v. Atlantic Coast Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by201 opinions
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Amalgamated Food Employees Union Local 590 v. Logan Valley Plaza, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. DennisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
- International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 695 v. Vogt, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
196 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.