Legal Opinion

Wilhelm v. Taylor

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 11, 1963No. 5-2910PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Paul Ward, Associate Justice.

This proceeding calls for an interpretation of Ark. Stats. § 27-340, which provides a method of obtaining service on a “non-resident”' person, firm, partnership, etc. The decisive issue is. whether the above section of the statutes applies to the petitioner, Mary Ruth Wilhelm, under the facts and circumstances of this case.

Factual Background. The uncontroverted material facts pertinent to a decision of the issue above mentioned are as presently set out. Prior to 1953 the petitioner was a domiciliary of Kansas; about that time she moved to Helena, Arkansas where…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Harrison v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1962
  2. Krone v. CooperSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1884
  3. Norton v. Purkins, JudgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1942
  4. Missouri Pac. R.R., Thompson, Trustee v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Belford v. TaylorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966
  2. Zalevsky v. CASILLOSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  3. Matter of Adoption of SamantSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  4. Zalevsky v. CASILLOSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API