Legal Opinion

Matter of Adoption of Samant

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 11, 1998No. 97-1358PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

David Newbern, Justice.

Appellant Annette Rose Samant petitioned to adopt Samantha Tara Samant, the biological daughter of Ms. Samant’s husband, Dr. Sushil Raghunata Samant, and a surrogate mother, Rebekkah Ann Nelson. The Chancellor denied the petition because Ms. Samant and Samantha were only temporarily present in Arkansas to effect the adoption with, as the Chancellor put it, “no pretense of residency or domicile.” We reverse and remand because Ark. Code Ann. § 9-9-205 (Repl. 1993), which establishes jurisdiction for adoption, poses no permanent residency or domicile requirement.

Ms. Nelson…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Davis v. HoltSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  2. Quinney v. PittmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  3. McLeod, Comm. of Rev. v. Santa Fe Trail Trans. Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  4. Martin v. HefleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
  5. Hogan v. DavisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Leathers v. WarmarkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  2. Roberts v. WestoverSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API