Krone v. Cooper
Supreme Court of Arkansas
APPEAL from Lawrence Circuit Court. Hon. R. H. Powell, Circuit Judge. The dwelling place of Krone’s family was not necessarily his domicile. The domicile of the family follows that of the head. Absence from the state does not make one a non-resident, however protracted, if he has the animo revertendi. 29 Arh., 280; 13 Mass., 501; 5 Bush, 671; 19 Wend., 11. “Residence” and “domicile” are not synonymous. One may have his residence in one state and his domicile in another.
Read the full summary
APPEAL from Lawrence Circuit Court. Hon. R. H. Powell, Circuit Judge. The dwelling place of Krone’s family was not necessarily his domicile. The domicile of the family follows that of the head. Absence from the state does not make one a non-resident, however protracted, if he has the animo revertendi. 29 Arh., 280; 13 Mass., 501; 5 Bush, 671; 19 Wend., 11. “Residence” and “domicile” are not synonymous. One may have his residence in one state and his domicile in another. Residence within the meaning of the attachment laws, is the place where a man remains the greater part of his time, and…
1Opinion of the CourtCockrill, C. J.
Cooper sued Krone, Oppenheimer and Boas on a promissory note, and sued out an attachment against Krone & Boas. There was a judgment in personam against all the defendants, and the attachments were sustained. The question chiefly litigated in the court below, and discussed by ■ counsel here, is whether Krone, who alone appeals, was a non-resident of this state at the time the attachment was sued out.
1. HeSI' PENCE. DO* micile: Meaning of. The terms “ resident5’ and “ non-resident ” used in the provisions of our statute governing attachments, have never been defined by this court, and the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Frost & Dickinson v. BrisbinNew York Supreme Court · 1837
- Board of Supervisors v. DavenportIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
- Chariton County v. MoberlySupreme Court of Missouri · 1875
- Morgan v. NunesMississippi Supreme Court · 1877
- Savage v. ScottSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Davis v. HoltSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
- Hanson v. GrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Shinn v. HeathSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
- Norton v. Purkins, JudgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1942
- Lawson v. AdlardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.