Hopkins v. Spokane, P. & S. Ry. Co.
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtEossman, J.
This is a personal injury action in which the parties concede that their rights are governed by the provisions of the Federal Employers’ Liability Act. At the time of his injury the plaintiff was a brakeman in the employ of the defendants, who are common carriers. From a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, based upon a verdict, the defendants appeal.
Since the assignments of error are limited to the single contention that the circuit court erred when it denied the defendants’ motion for a directed verdict, we shall proceed at once to a consideration of the evidence. The uncontradicted…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Improvement Company v. MunsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Gunning v. CooleySupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. CooganSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Jennings v. Tacoma Railway & Motor Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1893
- McGinnis v. Canada Southern Bridge Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1882
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hust v. Moore-Mccormick Lines, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1946
- Christie v. Great Northern Railway Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1933
- Hopkins v. Spokane, P. & S. Ry. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1931
- Johnson v. LaddOregon Supreme Court · 1933