Legal Opinion

McGinnis v. Canada Southern Bridge Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1882PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Error to Wayne. Case. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.

The defendant corporation owns and operates a .railroad across the Detroit river by way of Grosse Isle. The plaintiff, then twenty years and six months old, engaged in the service of defendant as switchman in December, 1879. He was inexperienced at the time, and the yard-master explained his duties to him. In January, 1880, when he had been employed a little less than two months, his foot was caught in a “ frog ” while he was engaged about his work, and before he could extricate it an engine ran upon him, inflicting serious injury. Plaintiff understood the danger from frogs before this…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. BayfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Swoboda v. WardMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Quincy Mining Co. v. KittsMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Michigan Central R. R. Co. v. SmithsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Fort Wayne, Jackson & Saginaw Railroad v. GildersleeveMichigan Supreme Court · 1876

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad v. DriscollIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Alcorn v. Chicago & Alton RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  3. Epperson v. Postal Telegraph Cable Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1900
  4. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad v. LonerganIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Wabash Railroad v. RayIndiana Supreme Court · 1898

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API