Legal Opinion

In re Mundorff

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided March 8, 1948PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES ALGER FEE, District Judge.

The Honorable Lowell Mundorff, Clerk of this Court, has asked for instructions0 as to what response shall be made to a praecipe which requests that he transmit to the Eastern District of Oklahoma the original papers in a criminal case or certified copies thereof in accordance with Rule 20, Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, 18 U.S.C.A. following section 687. The United States Attorney has likewise filed a motion that the Court direct the Clerk to transmit the papers to the Eastern Dis-rict of Oklahoma. The petition of the Clerk suggests that the rule is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Best v. ParkesOregon Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Thornburg v. MershonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
  3. People v. LamsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
  4. Miller v. ClaflinColorado Court of Appeals · 1898

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. Cassius HawkinsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
  2. States v. II Cases, More or Less, Ido-Pheno-ChonDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1950
  3. United States v. TollettDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1948
  4. United States v. ColesDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1949
  5. United States v. 11 CASES, ETC.District Court, D. Oregon · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API