Legal Opinion

City of Birmingham v. Wood

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 27, 1940No. 6 Div. 702PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

This is an action for damages for personal injuries resulting from a fall alleged to have been caused by a defect in the sidewalk.

The counts of the complaint (1, 4 and 6) which were submitted to the jury are thought to he defective by reason of the insufficiency of averment showing that the condition was not reasonably safe for use by the public.

Those counts do make that specific averment, but it is contended that the physical facts alleged are not sufficient predicate to support that averment of an absence of reasonable safety at that location. The physical facts alleged to…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. City of Birmingham v. CarleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  2. City of Bessemer v. WhaleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  3. Brown v. Milwaukee Terminal Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
  4. City of Montgomery v. FergusonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  5. Hanley v. Fireproof Building Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1922

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Graveman v. Wind Drift Owners' Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  2. City of Bessemer v. BrantleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  3. Schaefer v. LenahanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  4. Louis Pizitz Dry Goods Company v. HarrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
  5. City of Montgomery v. QuinnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API