Legal Opinion

City of Mobile v. McClure

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 10, 1930No. 1 Div. 592PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.

This is an action at law by the owner of property abutting upon a street for damages claimed by reason of the felling of a shade tree situated on the sidewalk in front of plaintiff’s residence.

The fundamental questions of law which are involved have been settled in this state, and need no further discussion. Brief-, ly stated, they are: (1) That if the tree was cut by the city while engaged in the construction or enlargement of the works, highways, or improvements of the city, and the property, of the lot owner is thereby injured or destroyed, the city is liable in damages to the extent of an…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Southern Ry. Co. v. DicksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  2. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Marbury Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1899
  3. Tennessee Coal, Iron & R. R. v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  4. Best Park & Amusement Co. v. RollinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  5. Lawson v. Mobile Electric Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1920

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Butler v. OlshanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
  2. Alabama Power Company v. GuySupreme Court of Alabama · 1967
  3. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY INC. v. HareCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1972
  4. Dorsey v. DorseySupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  5. W. T. Ratliff Company, Inc. v. PurvisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API