Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. David Leroy Lee

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 2014No. 40330Published

1DissentHorton, J.

I respectfully dissent. In this appeal, Lee claims that the district court erred by denying his motion to strike a single sentence from the judgment of acquittal that this Court instructed the district court to enter in our decision in State v. Lee, 153 Idaho 559, 563, 286 P.3d 537, 541 (2012). Lee advanced three theories in support of his claim that the district court erred: (1) the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to include the language to which he objects; (2) the district court abused its discretion by failing to act consistently with the governing legal standards on…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wisconsin v. ConstantineauSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Connecticut Department of Public Safety v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. John Doe, I Jane Doe John Doe, II v. Bill Tandeske Gregg D. RenkesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  4. Ray v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Bach v. MillerIdaho Supreme Court · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API