Garcia v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Douglas, J.:
In this appeal, we examine whether preclusive effect should be given to an order, entered by a federal district court sitting in diversity, dismissing a complaint without prejudice for failure to state a claim. In doing so, we clarify that our holding in Bower *17v. Harrah’s Laughlin, 125 Nev. 470, 482, 215 P.3d 709, 718 (2009), which broadly required Nevada courts to apply federal law in determining whether a prior federal court determination should be given preclusive effect, applies only to federal-question cases. When the federal court decides a case under its…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Taylor v. SturgellSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Semtek International Inc. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- State v. WatkinsUtah Supreme Court · 2013
- Guerrero v. Cal. Dep't of Corr. & Rehab., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- BUMA VS. PROVIDENCE CORP. DEV.Nevada Supreme Court · 2019
- HARRIS v. STATENevada Supreme Court · 2022
- In re BlanchardUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 2016
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.