Legal Opinion

Minnesota Transitions Charter School v. Commissioner of Minnesota Department of Education

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided March 17, 2014No. A13-1232PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CLEARY, Chief Judge.

Relator Minnesota Transitions Charter School challenges a decision of the Minnesota Department of Education (MDE) that relator is not eligible to operate its alternative-learning program (ALP) under MinmStat. § 128A.05 (2012). On appeal, relator argues that MDE erroneously interpreted section 123A.05, subdivision 1(a), and the related statutory scheme. Additionally, relator argues that MDE’s decision constitutes an unpromulgated agency rule, that the decision was not supported by substantial evidence, and that the decision was arbitrary and capricious. We affirm…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  2. Amaral v. Saint Cloud HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  3. Cable Communications Board v. Nor-West Cable Communications PartnershipSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  4. Contested Cases of St. Otto's Home v. Minnesota Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  5. Wallace v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. Minnesota Transitions Charter SchoolsDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
  2. State v. MikeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2018
  3. In re Defense and Indemnification of Alexander Vladimir BrownCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2025
  4. In re Minn. Living Assistance, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2018
  5. In re Revlimid & Thalomid Purchase Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2026

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API