Wood-Hopkins Contracting Co. v. North Carolina State Ports Authority
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HIGGINS, Justice.
The defendant first challenged the plaintiff’s right to recover in this action on the ground the contract required the plaintiff to perform labor, furnish materials, and complete its obligation under the contract for the fixed lump sum stated in the contract.
The parties stipulated that the plaintiff filed a base bid of $2,947,417.00 and $350,330.00 and $94,402.00 for certain alternative proposals. The contract specifically provided for a unit price for certain items of construction. These items included a provision of $2.00 per cubic yard for underwater fill compressed in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Harris & Harris Construction Co. v. Crain & Denbo, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Root v. Allstate Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Bizzell v. BizzellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- Yates v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- General Metals, Inc. v. Truitt Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Adder v. Holman & Moody, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- Munchak Corp. v. CaldwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. BrinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
- Chavis v. Southern Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- Lawing v. LawingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.