Legal Opinion

Yates v. Brown

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 19, 1969No. 7PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLaice, J.

It was error for the trial court to submit to the jury the question of whether the writing and signatures upon the back of the note in suit constituted a qualified or an unqualified o indorsement. There being no dispute as to the content or the genuineness of the writing and no conflict in the admitted evidence as to the circumstances under which it was signed, the effect of it was a question of law for the court. Lowe v. Jackson, 263 N.C. 634, 140 S.E. 2d 1; Robbins v. Trading Post, 253 N.C. 474, 117 S.E. 2d 438; Evans v. Rockingham Homes, Inc., 220 N.C. 253, 17 S.E. 2d 125; Dillard v.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Evans v. Freeman.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  2. Root v. Allstate Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. Jones v. . CasstevensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  4. Robbins v. C. W. Myers Trading Post, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  5. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Davis v. Dennis Lilly Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  2. Hicks v. AlbertsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  3. Zinn v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  4. Wood-Hopkins Contracting Co. v. North Carolina State Ports AuthoritySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  5. In Re Foreclosure of Sutton Investments, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API