Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Cobb v. Snohomish County

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 28, 1992No. 24680-1-IPublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPekelis, J.

Larry Cobb, Robert Hale, and R/L Associates, Inc. (Cobb), challenge the validity of Title 26B of the Snohomish County Code (SCC) which requires that developers share in the cost of improving road systems impacted by proposed land development projects. Cobb contends that the ordinance imposes unauthorized taxes, fees or charges on developers, violates substantive due process, and effects a taking of private property without just compensation.

*453I

A. SCC Title 26B.

On May 11, 1982, the Snohomish County Council adopted a revised road ordinance, SCC Title 26B, in an effort to address those problems…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hillis Homes, Inc. v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. R/L ASSOCIATES, INC. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Blue Sky Advocates v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Southwick, Inc. v. City of LaceyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990
  5. Pentagram Corp. v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Hillis v. State, Dept. of EcologyWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Crosby v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Trimen Development Co. v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Crosby v. County of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Cobb v. Snohomish CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API