United States v. Hanley
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GRABER, Circuit Judge:
In this consolidated appeal, defendants Carl R. Hanley, Randall E. Moore, William B. Scott, Jr., and John William Fry appeal from their convictions and sentences for wire fraud, conspiracy to commit wire fraud, and money laundering. Defendants’ convictions stem from their operation of a fraudulent telemarketing enterprise, Legendary Concepts, Inc. We affirm.
*1021FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
I. FACTUAL HISTORY
Our recitation of facts is governed by the principle that the evidence introduced at trial must be viewed in the light most favorable to the government. See United…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Ronald O. Pelletier v. Gary D. Zweifel, Ronald O. Pelletier v. Gary D. ZweifelCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
- United States v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. John Bagnariol, United States of America v. Gordon L. Walgren, United States of America v. Patrick GallagherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Sakhawat Ullah, Jr., United States of America v. Mary Katherine Gosho-KimCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Michael Paul HouserCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by73 opinions
- United States v. Robert Louis Syrax, AKA Bob Johnson, AKA Robert L. SyraxCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. FernandezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Jose Luis Gonzalez-FloresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- William Harold Mancuso, Petitioner-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Ana M. Olivarez, Respondent-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Jorge Alberto AlatorreCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.