Legal Opinion

William Harold Mancuso, Petitioner-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Ana M. Olivarez, Respondent-Appellee-Cross-Appellant

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 11, 2002No. 00-16188, 00-16657PublishedCited by 145 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The opinion filed March 6, 2002, reported : at 282 F.3d 728 (9th Cir.2002), is amended as follows: at .page 737, delete the paragraph that begins “On habeas review, ...” and insert the following language:

On habeas review, Mancuso is entitled to habeas relief only if it can be estab lished that the alleged trial error had a substantial and injurious effect, or influence on the jury’s verdict. See Brecht v. Abrahamson, 507 U.S. 619, 637, 113 S.Ct. 1710, 123 L.Ed.2d 353 (1993); O’Neal v. McAninch, 513 U.S. 432, 436, 115 S.Ct. 992, 130 L.Ed.2d 947 (1995); Thompson v. Borg, 74 F.3d 1571, 1575…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Barefoot v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by145 opinions

  1. Mladen Zivkovic v. Southern California Edison CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  2. Butler v. CurryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  3. Douglas Ray Stankewitz v. Jeanne S. Woodford, Warden, San Quentin State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  4. United States v. BerryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  5. William v. Luna v. Steven Cambra, Jr., Warden Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

140 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API