Legal Opinion

United States v. Jose Luis Gonzalez-Flores

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 12, 2005No. 03-10656PublishedCited by 154 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BETTY B. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge.

Defendant-appellant Jose Luis Gonzalez-Flores (“Gonzalez”) was convicted of alien smuggling for leading a group of nearly two dozen Mexicans into the United States across the desert. In this direct appeal, Gonzalez claims that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction and that certain testimony admitted at trial was irrelevant and unduly prejudicial. Gonzalez also attacks his sentence on Booker grounds; the government argues in response that he waived his Sixth Amendment rights.

We hold that the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Old Chief v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. United States v. Alfred Arnold AmelineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by154 opinions

  1. United States v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  2. United States v. Jesus Adrian Beng-SalazarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  3. United States v. HatfieldCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  4. People v. SandovalCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
  5. United States v. BanksCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

149 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API