Legal Opinion

Kermit George Hilliard v. Larry Kincheloe and Kenneth O. Eikenberry

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 6, 1986No. 84-3818PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Kermit George Hilliard appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for an extension of time in which to appeal the dismissal of his petition for writ of habeas corpus. See Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(5).

Hilliard was convicted in the Washington state court of second degree assault. The conviction was affirmed on appeal. State v. Hilliard, 89 Wash.2d 430, 573 P.2d 22 (1977) (en banc). On October 18, 1983, Hilliard filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus in federal court. He also filed a motion for the appointment of coun sel on the same date. The district court did not rule on this…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. HilliardWashington Supreme Court · 1977

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. LutzDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2003
  2. Abdullah Muhammad v. Jim RowlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  3. Alaska Wildlife Alliance v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife ServiceDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2023
  4. Andrew v. DoeDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2022
  5. Angellan v. ZoreaDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2022

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API