Legal Opinion
Abdullah Muhammad v. Jim Rowland
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 11, 1991No. 90-15776Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
944 F.2d 909
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Abdullah MUHAMMAD, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Jim ROWLAND, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 90-15776.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 5, 1991.*
Decided Sept. 11, 1991.
Before CANBY, DAUOR, THOMPSON and TROTT, Circuit Judges.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Joseph Jackson, II v. State of Arizona (Unknown) Terry, Deputy Acting Warden (Unknown) Avenenti, Deputy WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Edward McKeever Jr. v. Sherman BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Al-Hakim Allah v. Superior Court of the State of California, Los Angeles County, R.A. Doeve, Real-Parties-In-InterestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Kermit George Hilliard v. Larry Kincheloe and Kenneth O. EikenberryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986