Legal Opinion
State v. Hilliard
Washington Supreme Court
Decided December 29, 1977No. 44744PublishedCited by 71 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrachtenbach, J.
Defendant appeals a second-degree assault conviction. Three issues are raised: (1) alleged lack of a Miranda warning; (2) alleged impermissible photographic identification procedure; (3) right to trial by impartial jury. We affirm.
The assault victim was a 17-year-old girl. Shortly after midnight, she had left her home and gone to a nearby telephone booth. While using the phone, she observed a car drive by two or three times. She recognized the driver as defendant Hilliard because she had met him on two prior occasions; she did not know his name.
Alarmed by the defendant's conduct, the victim…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- State v. TillmanUtah Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. RupeWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. CienfuegosWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- Heinemann v. Whitman CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Kermit George Hilliard v. Larry Kincheloe and Kenneth O. EikenberryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.