Legal Opinion

Alaska Wildlife Alliance v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided February 6, 2023No. 3:21-cv-00209Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA 4 5 6 ALASKA WILDLIFE ALLIANCE, et al., 7 Plaintiffs, 8 v. Case No. 3:21-cv-00209-SLG-KFR 9 U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE et al., 10 Defendants. 11 12 13 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION RE MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 14 The Court recommends Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment at Docket 31 15 be DENIED. The Court further recommends Defendants’ Cross-Motions for Summary 16 Judgment at Dockets 38 and 43 be GRANTED. Plaintiffs argue that Defendant United 17 States Fish and Wildlife Service (“FWS”) unlawfully authorized the…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API