In Re Deep Vein Thrombosis
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
WALKER, Chief Judge.
Before the court are defendant Boeing Company’s (Boeing) motions for summary judgment on plaintiffs’ state law claims for product liability, negligence and breach of warranty. Docs # 56, 63. Plaintiffs concede that judgment should be entered in favor of Boeing on all breach of warranty claims. Doe # 94 at 17.
Plaintiffs, however, oppose Boeing’s motions as they relate to the claims for product liability and negligence. Docs # 94, 95. The court heard oral arguments on these motions on January 13, 2005. After reviewing the parties’ memoranda and the applicable law, the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Sammy Lee Terrell v. R.D. Brewer, Warden Jon Morales Christopher C. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Thornhill Publishing Company, Inc. v. General Telephone & Electronics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- O'NEIL v. Crane Co.California Supreme Court · 2012
- Air & Liquid Systems Corp. v. DeVriesSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
- Simonetta v. Viad Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2008
- Braaten v. Saberhagen HoldingsWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- Taylor v. Elliott Turbomachinery Co. Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.