Legal Opinion
Simonetta v. Viad Corp.
Washington Supreme Court
Decided December 11, 2008No. 80076-6PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
197 P.3d 127 (2008)
Joseph A. SIMONETTA and Janet E. Simonetta, a married couple, Respondents,
v.
VIAD CORPORATION f/k/a The Dial Corporation, individually and as Successor to Griscom Russell Company, Petitioner, and
Saberhagen Holdings, Inc., as successor to Tacoma Asbestos Company and The Brower Company; Bartells Asbestos Settlement Trust; Aqua-Chem, Inc., individually and as successor to Cleaver-Brooks Company; Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation; General Electric Company; General Refractories Company; IMO Industries, Inc., individually and as successor-in-interest to De Laval Turbine, Inc.;…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- McLeod v. Grant County School District No. 128Washington Supreme Court · 1953
- Lockwood v. a C & S, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1987
- Rastelli v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Seattle-First National Bank v. TabertWashington Supreme Court · 1975
- Terhune v. A. H. Robins Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1978
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- O'NEIL v. Crane Co.California Supreme Court · 2012
- Macias v. Saberhagen Holdings, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2012
- Lunsford v. Saberhagen Holdings, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2009
- Lunsford v. Saberhagen Holdings, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2009
- Braaten v. Saberhagen HoldingsWashington Supreme Court · 2008
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.