Legal Opinion

Braaten v. Saberhagen Holdings

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 2008No. 80251-3PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

198 P.3d 493 (2008)

Vernon BRAATEN (deceased); and Lynn Christine Musser, personal representative of the estate of Vernon Braaten, Respondents,

v.

SABERHAGEN HOLDINGS, a Washington corporation; and Bartells Asbestos Settlement Trust, a Washington corporation, Defendants,

Buffalo Pumps, Inc. (sued individually and as successor-in-interest to Buffalo Forge Company); and Crane Co., Petitioners,

General Electric Company, Respondent,

Georgia-Pacific Corporation (sued individually and as successor-in-interest to Bestwall Gypsum Company); Goulds Pumps, Incorporated; and Guard-Line, Inc., Defendants,

IMO…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Firestone Steel Products Co. v. BarajasTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Lockwood v. a C & S, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Rastelli v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Seattle-First National Bank v. TabertWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Ulmer v. Ford Motor Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1969

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. O'NEIL v. Crane Co.California Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Macias v. Saberhagen Holdings, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Lunsford v. Saberhagen Holdings, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Lunsford v. Saberhagen Holdings, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Taylor v. Elliott Turbomachinery Co. Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API