Legal Opinion

Senior Technologies, Inc. v. R.F. Technologies, Inc.

District Court, D. Nebraska

Decided February 17, 2000No. 4:97CV3241PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

KOPF, Chief Judge.

This is a patent infringement suit in which Plaintiff sued Defendant for infringement of two of its patents and Defendant filed counterclaims seeking declarations that one of Plaintiffs patents was invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 102, and that both of the patents at issue were unenforceable due to inequitable conduct before the U.S.Patent and Trademark Office. (Filing 250, Order on Final Pretrial Conf., at 7-8; Filing 42, Amended Counterclaim.) On September 1, 1999, judgment was entered in part as follows:

1. Judgment is entered against Plaintiff, and in favor…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Manildra Milling Corp. v. Ogilvie Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
  3. Robert P. Kropp v. Sylvester A. Ziebarth, A/K/A Silver A. Ziebarth, and Carol A. Ziebarth, Husband and Wife, and Cleon StriegelCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
  4. Kalkowski v. Ronco, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1976
  5. Compro-Frink Co. v. Valk Manufacturing Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Trading Technologies International, Inc. v. Espeed, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010
  2. Lyons v. Nike, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2013
  3. Automatic Equipment Manufacturing Company v. Danko Manufacturing, LLCDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API