Legal Opinion

T & T GEOTECHNICAL, INC. v. Union Pacific Resources Co.

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided July 31, 1996No. 4:95-cv-00644Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

McBRYDE, District Judge.

Came on for consideration the motion of defendant, Union Pacific Resources Company (“UPRC”), for partial summary judgment, and the motions of plaintiffs, T & T Geotech-nical, Inc., (“T & T”), Timothy C. Dean (“Dean”), and Terry L. Norris (“Norris”), for partial summary judgment.

I

The Dispute

This action involves a dispute over certain technology used in drilling oil and gas wells.

On May 17, 1994, United States Patent No. 5,311,951 (hereinafter “the ’951 patent”) entitled “Method of Maintaining a Borehole in a Stratigraphic Zone During…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API