Legal Opinion

Sample v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided September 8, 1995No. 94-1158PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAULINE NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.

Appellants are former employees of the V.A. Medical Center in North Chicago, Illinois. They appeal from the dismissal by the United States District Court for the North-*940em District of Illinois1 of their claims for environmental differential pay (EDP). The district court held that the grievance procedure of the collective bargaining agreement between Appellants and the Department of Veterans Affairs, which was in force at the time of their employment, constitutes their only avenue of redress. The district court thus dismissed the suit. We affirm, for the Appellants…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Allied Chemical & Alkali Workers of America, Local Union No. 1 v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Carter v. GibbsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  3. Muniz v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
  4. Aamodt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
  5. Sample v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kevin A. Dunklebarger v. Merit Systems Protection BoardCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
  2. Hickman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
  3. Abramson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
  4. Martin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
  5. Sample v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API