Legal Opinion
Martin v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided April 28, 1998No. 97-584 CPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MOODY R. TIDWELL, III, Judge.
This case is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, filed pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Rules of the Court of Federal Claims. Plaintiff, formerly an employee of the Federal Bureau of Prisons, brought this civilian pay action pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-219 (1994 & Supp. I 1995), seeking compensation for sick leave, regular time and overtime pay. For the reasons set forth below, the court allows defendant’s motion to dismiss.
BACKGROUND1
Plaintiff, as a former employee…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Lindahl v. Office of Personnel ManagementSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- James L. Lewis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Carter v. GibbsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Abramson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998