Legal Opinion
Dayton Bar Assn. v. Rogers
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided June 16, 1999No. 1998-2660PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 86 Ohio St.3d 25.] DAYTON BAR ASSOCIATION v. ROGERS. [Cite as Dayton Bar Assn. v. Rogers,
1999-Ohio-338.] Attorneys at law—Misconduct—One-year suspension with entire suspension stayed—Commingling own funds with clients’ funds. (No. 98-2660—Submitted March 30, 1999—Decided June 16, 1999.) ON CERTIFIED REPORT by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court, No. 97-43. __________________ {¶ 1} From May 9, 1995 through July 26, 1996, respondent, Richard H. Rogers of Dayton, Ohio, Attorney
Registration No.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Erie-Huron Counties Joint Certified Grievance Committee v. MilesOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Columbus Bar Ass'n v. BrooksOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. MazerOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Dayton Bar Ass'n v. RogersOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- Disciplinary Counsel v. MazerOhio Supreme Court · 1996
3Cited by2 opinions
- Disciplinary Counsel v. MorganOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- Ohio State Bar Assn. v. KanterOhio Supreme Court · 1999