Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Mazer

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 28, 1996No. 1996-0985PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 76 Ohio St.3d 481.] OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. MAZER. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Mazer,

1996-Ohio-378.] Attorneys at law—Misconduct—Six-month suspension with sanction stayed on conditions—Failure to maintain client funds in an identifiable bank account—Conduct adversely reflecting on fitness to practice law— Representing a client knowing that his continued employment will result in a violation of a Disciplinary Rule—Accepting employment if the exercise of attorney’s professional judgment on behalf of client will be…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. MazerOhio Supreme Court · 1996

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dayton Bar Assn. v. RogersOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Ass'n v. DavisOhio Supreme Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API