Holmes v. BOARD OF COM'RS OF WABASHA CTY.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRIPPEN, Judge.
Appellant challenges the trial court’s determination that respondent William Holmes is not the “head of a department” and is therefore entitled to protection under the Veterans Preference Act. We affirm.
FACTS
Respondent William Holmes was fired from his job as Zoning Administrator, Agricultural Inspector, and Civil Defense Director for appellant Board of Commissioners of Wabasha County. Holmes is an honorably discharged veteran of the U.S. armed forces and requested a discharge hearing as provided by the Veterans Preference Act. Appellant refused to conduct a hearing,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- In Re Trust Known as Great Northern Iron Ore PropertiesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- State Ex Rel. McGinnis v. Police Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- State Ex Rel. Meehan v. EmpieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- State Ex Rel. Sprague v. HeiseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Bruno Ex Rel. Bruno v. BelmonteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Schiltz v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Schleck v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- Armstrong v. Civil Service Commission of St. PaulCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993