Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Civil Service Commission of St. Paul

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 6, 1993No. C9-92-1783PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RANDALL, Judge.

In January of 1987, appellant Stevén Armstrong, an employee of respondent City of St. Paul (city), petitioned the St. Paul Civil Service Commission for reconsideration of his employee status. He also sought “equitable compensation” pursuant to the Minnesota Pay Equity Act (MPEA), Minn.Stat. §§ 471.991-.999 (1988). After á hearing, the Commission found that even though appellant had acquired the skills of a building inspector, his job required only the skills of code enforcement. The Commission ordered that appellant’s employee status remain the same.

Appellant commenced…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & ClinicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. A. J. Chromy Construction Co. v. Commercial Mechanical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. Holmes v. BOARD OF COM'RS OF WABASHA CTY.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. St. Cloud Police Relief Ass'n v. City of St. CloudCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API