De Nardo v. State
Court of Appeals of Alaska
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MANNHEIMER, Judge.
Daniel De Nardo was convicted, following trial in the district court at Anchorage, of third-degree weapons misconduct (carrying a concealed weapon), AS 11.61.220(a)(1). He appeals his conviction, contending that his conduct did not violate this statute or, alternatively, that the statute is unconstitutionally vague. We affirm.
Alaska State Trooper George Blicken-staff encountered De Nardo in the Anchorage courthouse and arrested him for outstanding traffic warrants. Blickenstaff asked De Nardo to accompany him and Trooper Simon Brown to the trooper office in the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Dixson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Stock v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Summers v. AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Sutherland v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1909
- Larson v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Ward v. State, Department of Public SafetyAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
- People v. WadeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
- Halliburton Energy Services v. State, Department of LaborAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
- Territory of Hawaii v. MendoncaHawaii Supreme Court · 1962
- Jason D. Ray v. State of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 2022
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.