Legal Opinion
Dixson v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided February 22, 1984No. 82-5279PublishedCited by 123 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Marshall
These consolidated cases present the question whether officers of a private, nonprofit corporation administering and expending federal community development block grants are “public officials” for purposes of the federal bribery statute. 18 U. S. C. § 201(a).
I
In 1979, the city of Peoria received two federal block grants from the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). The first was a $400,000 Community Development Block Grant; the second a $638,000 Metro Reallocation Grant. Both grants were funded through the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 (HCDA), 88 Stat. 633, as…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Rewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by123 opinions
- Salinas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Tal v. HoganCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Sabri v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. Sonya Evette SingletonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. R. L. C.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
118 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.