Legal Opinion

Sequoia Insurance Company v. Royal Insurance Company of America

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 23, 1992No. 90-16820PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judge:

This appeal involves a dispute between a primary insurer and an excess insurer, arising out of an automobile accident and a consequent wrongful death action. Royal Insurance Company appeals the entry of summary judgment in favor of Sequoia Insurance Company in Sequoia’s action to recover the portion of the wrongful death judgment it paid in excess of policy limits. As is common in insurance disputes, the threshold issue with which we are presented is policy coverage. Beyond that, this case also presents a novel question under California law: whether in an action…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Comunale v. Traders & General InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Clemmer v. Hartford Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Reserve Insurance Co. v. PisciottaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. In Re Marriage of ArceneauxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Nordstrom, Inc. v. Chubb & Son, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  2. Mez Industries, Inc. v. Pacific National InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  3. Nordstrom, Inc. v. Chubb & Son, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  4. Old Republic Ins. Co. v. Superior Court of L.A. Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1998
  5. Sprinkles v. Associated Indemnity Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2010

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API