Legal Opinion

F. M. Davis Iron Works Co. v. White

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 15, 1903No. 4256PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Arapahoe County.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Campbell

In this action, brought for the recovery of damages for personal injuries, there was a verdict for plaintiff in the sum of thirty thousand dollars. Upon a motion for a new trial, based in part upon the fifth subdivision of section 217 of the code, which declares that a new trial may be granted to the ■ aggrieved party where excessive damages against him appear to have been given under the influence of passion or prejudice, the trial court, having found that the damages as awarded by the jury were excessive thereunder, said to the plaintiff that a new trial would be granted upon defendant’s…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Arkansas Valley Land & Cattle Co. v. MannSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Koenigsberger v. Richmond Silver Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Hansen v. BoydSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. Baker v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Germania Life Insurance v. LewinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1897

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Burns v. McGraw-Hill Broadcasting Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  2. State v. CampbellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  3. Hutchinson v. KruegerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Barth v. WhiteArizona Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Stephens Ranch & Live Stock Co. v. Union Pac. R.Utah Supreme Court · 1916

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API