Legal Opinion

Koenigsberger v. Richmond Silver Mining Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 22, 1895No. Nos. 260 and 220PublishedCited by 76 opinions

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gray

This.was an action at law, commenced October 17, 1883, in the district court of the first judicial district of the Territory of Dakota, in and for Lawrence County, by Victor Dome' against the Richmond Silver Mining Company. The complaint alleged that the plaintiff, on December 11, 1882, sold and conveyed to the defendant a certain interest in mining claims' in that county; that the defendant, in consideration thereof, agreed to transfer and deliver to the: plaintiff, within three weeks, 14,285f shares of its corporate stock; and that the defendant transferred and delivered to the plaintiff…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. American Insurance v. 356 Bales of CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
  2. Northern Pacific Railroad v. HerbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Barney v. Baltimore CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1868
  4. Kennon v. GilmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  5. Arkansas Valley Land & Cattle Co. v. MannSupreme Court of the United States · 1889

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. Dimick v. SchiedtSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Eagle Properties, Ltd. v. ScharbauerTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Wichita Railroad & Light Co. v. Public Utilities Commission of KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. Donovan v. Penn Shipping Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Knudson v. Systems Painters, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API