Legal Opinion

Loeffler v. Target Corporation

California Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 2014No. S173972PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 5/1/14 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA KIMBERLY LOEFFLER et al., ) ) Plaintiffs and Appellants, ) ) S173972 v. ) ) Ct.App. 2/3 B199287 TARGET CORPORATION, ) ) Los Angeles County Defendant and Respondent. ) Super. Ct. No. BC360004 ____________________________________) Plaintiffs are consumers who contend that defendant retailer represented that it properly was charging and in fact charged them sales tax reimbursement on sales of hot coffee sold “to go,” when, according to plaintiffs, the tax code rendered such sales exempt from sales tax. They brought an action against defendant…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Kwikset Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Schifando v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Stand up for California v. State of Cal.California Court of Appeal · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API