Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Stand up for California v. State of Cal.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 12, 2016No. F069302Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

FRANSON, J.,

Concurring and Dissenting.—I concur in all parts of the disposition in the lead opinion and agree with its resolution of some of the legal questions presented. I write separately to identify the legal issues that I have resolved differently and the points on which I agree.

This appeal addresses the controversial issue of off-reservation casinos1 and whether the Governor of California has the authority to approve off-reservation gambling on previously nontribal lands. The specific question of California law is whether the Governor has the constitutional authority to concur in the…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. United States v. WheelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Edward J. DeBartolo Corp. v. Florida Gulf Coast Building & Construction Trades CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Worcester v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  5. Cherokee Nation v. State of GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1831

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API