Legal Opinion

International Expediters, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided November 13, 1959No. 63511; protests 312836-K and 325691-K (New York)Published

1Opinion of the Court

Oliver, Chief Judge:

These two protests relate to certain electric motors which were assessed with duty at the rate of 35 per centum ad valorem under the provision in paragraph 1513 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, for toys and parts thereof, not specially provided for. Plaintiffs claim that the articles are properly dutiable at only 12y2 per centum ad valorem under the eo nomine provision for electric motors in paragraph 353 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended.

Two witnesses testified. Both appeared on behalf of plaintiffs. The importer, Philip M. Childs, sole proprietor of the Moen…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. WanamakerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API