Legal Opinion
Otto Henning v. Scott F. Hunt
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided July 1, 1955No. Patent Appeal 5884PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Judge.
This is an appeal, under Rev.Stat. 4911, now 35 U.S.C. § 141, from the decision of the Board of Interference Examiners of the United States Patent Office awarding priority of invention as claimed in the single count in issue to appellee, Scott F. Hunt.
The invention here involved relates to carburetors for internal combustion engines, and more particularly to means for automatically controlling the position of the choke valve of the carburetor in response to variations in the temperature and suction developed by the engine during its operation. The count in issue is:
“In a…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Butterworth v. United States Ex Rel. HoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- In re RobertsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1920
- International Cellucotton Products Co. v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1936
- Avery v. ChaseCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1939
- In Re AustinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Charles B. Swain and Albert G. Schuessler v. Bob C. CrittendonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
- Robert C. Switzer and Richard A. Ward v. Loy W. Sockman and Elliot W. BradyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
- Turchan v. Bailey Meter Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1958
- Scott F. Hunt v. Irven E. Coffey, (Two Cases). Irven E. Coffey v. Scott F. Hunt, (Two Cases)Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955
- Robert C. Switzer and Richard A. Ward v. Loy W. Sockman and Elliot W. BradyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964