Stroud v. Sinclair Refining Co.
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Thiele, J.:
This was an action for damages for negligence, the
principalquestion being whether the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur applied under the facts.
Omitting unnecessary portions, the petition alleged that plaintiff, on March 20, 1934, was engaged in setting stone in a driveway of a filling station in Kansas City, Mo.; that employees of the defendant were engaged in erecting a sign on the station building and while so doing used sliding ladders; that in placing and using the ladders defendant’s employees, through negligence, insecurely placed the *75ladd…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Mayes v. Kansas City Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1926
- Zinn ex rel. Zinn v. UpdegraffSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
- Brown v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
- St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. BurrowsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1900
- Potter v. Rorabaugh-Wiley Dry Goods Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1911
3Cited by32 opinions
- Starks Food Markets, Inc. v. El Dorado Refining Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1943
- Emigh v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1948
- Lamb v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1956
- Bradley v. Conway Springs Bottling Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1941
- Bias v. Montgomery Elevator Co. of Kansas, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1975
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.