Cerone v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER:
GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
[Doc. No. 37]
DENYING DEFENDANT’S CROSS-MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
[Doc. No. 38]
MICHAEL M. ANELLO, District Judge.
This action involves a claim for accidental death benefits arising under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et. seq. Plaintiff Debra Cerone and Defendants Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company and The Picerne Group Health & Welfare Plan (collectively “Defendants”) have filed cross motions for partial summary judgment on the applicable standard of review. Doc. Nos.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- T.W. Electrical Service, Inc. v. Pacific Electrical Contractors Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Kentucky Assn. of Health Plans, Inc. v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bentley v. United of Omaha Life Ins. Co.District Court, C.D. California · 2019
- Osborn ex rel. Petit v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2016
- Curran v. United of Omaha Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2014
- Murphy v. California Physicians ServiceDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2016
- Dallenbach v. Standard Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.