Legal Opinion

Cerone v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance

District Court, S.D. California

Decided March 28, 2014No. Case No. 13CV184-MMA-DHBPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER:

GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

[Doc. No. 37]

DENYING DEFENDANT’S CROSS-MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

[Doc. No. 38]

MICHAEL M. ANELLO, District Judge.

This action involves a claim for accidental death benefits arising under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et. seq. Plaintiff Debra Cerone and Defendants Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company and The Picerne Group Health & Welfare Plan (collectively “Defendants”) have filed cross motions for partial summary judgment on the applicable standard of review. Doc. Nos.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. T.W. Electrical Service, Inc. v. Pacific Electrical Contractors Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  5. Kentucky Assn. of Health Plans, Inc. v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bentley v. United of Omaha Life Ins. Co.District Court, C.D. California · 2019
  2. Osborn ex rel. Petit v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2016
  3. Curran v. United of Omaha Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2014
  4. Murphy v. California Physicians ServiceDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2016
  5. Dallenbach v. Standard Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API