Legal Opinion
Curran v. United of Omaha Life Insurance
District Court, S.D. California
Decided July 15, 2014No. Case No. 12CV1935 JLS (BLM)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER (1) GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT; AND, (2) DENYING DEFENDANT’S CROSS MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
(ECF Nos. 32, 33)
JANIS L. SAMMARTINO, District Judge.
Presently before the Court are Plaintiff Robin Curran’s (“Plaintiff’) and Defendant United of Omaha , Life Insurance Company’s (“United”) cross motions for partial summary judgment on the standard of review. (PI. Mot. for Partial Summ. J., ECF No. 33; Def. Mot. for Partial Summ. J., ECF No. 32.) The Court heard oral argument on April 28, 2014 and the motions were taken under submission thereafter. Having…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Rex T. KEARNEY, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Martin v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.District Court, C.D. California · 2016
- Murphy v. California Physicians ServiceDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2016