Legal Opinion

State v. Casey

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 10, 1931PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stacy, 0. J.,

after stating tbe case: Tbe appeal calls for a ruling upon an important question of practice: "When may tbe courts entertain a motion in a criminal case for a new trial on tbe grounds of information affecting tbe competency of jurors, and for newly discovered evidence, wbicb come to tbe attention of tbe defendant after trial and conviction ?

Undoubtedly, if knowledge of tbe matters and things, now urged as grounds for a new trial, bad come to tbe movant during tbe term of court at wbicb be was tried and convicted, tbe judge at tbat term, tbe trial term, would bave been clotbed…

2Cases cited82 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Attorney General of the United States v. Delaware & Hudson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. Adkins v. Children's Hospital of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Davis v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  4. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  5. Johnson v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1913

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. State v. CroninSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. State v. BeaverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. State v. SaulsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  4. State v. CrumpSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  5. State v. MorrowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API