Burt v. Arkansas Livestock & Poultry Commission
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
John I. Purtle, Justice.
The chancellor issued a mandatory injunction which required appellant to assemble his cattle for the purpose of testing for brucellosis by the Arkansas State Livestock and Poultry Commission. The injunction was stayed pending this appeal.
On appeal appellant contends the statutes and regulations involved herein are unconstitutional inasmuch as they deny him due process and equal protection of the law. We hold that the statutes and regulations do not deny appellant due process or equal protection either on their face or as applied in the case now before us.
The facts of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Hadacheck v. SebastianSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Corbitt v. Mohawk Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
- Nunley v. Texas Animal Health CommissionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
- State Ex Rel. Hale, Prosecuting Atty. v. LawsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gay v. RabonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
- State v. PetersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
- Winters v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
- Johansson v. Board of Animal HealthDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1985
- Gay v. RabonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.