Legal Opinion

Corbitt v. Mohawk Rubber Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 8, 1974No. 74-45PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank Holt, Justice.

The Workmen’s Compensation Commission, in affirming the referee, found the appellant was permanently and totally disabled from the combined effects of two successive and compensable work related back injuries while employed by the appellee Mohawk Rubber Company. However, in awarding the benefits, the commission applied the provisions of Ark. Stat. Ann. § 81-1313 (f) (Supp. 1973) which limited appellant’s total recovery to $19,-500 which was the maximum when appellant received his last injury in 1969. The circuit court affirmed the commission and from that judgment comes…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Dunn v. BlumsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. F. S. Royster Guano Co. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. Bain Peanut Co. of Tex. v. PinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. Wilson & Co. v. ChristmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Davis v. CoxSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  2. Matter of Estate of EppersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  3. Holland v. WillisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  4. Rooney v. CharlesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  5. Hamilton v. Jeffrey Stone Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1988

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API