Bublitz v. Wilkins Buick, Mazda, Suzuki, Inc.
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hutchinson
Plaintiffs filed a complaint against defendants, Wilkins Buick, Mazda, Suzuki, Inc. (Wilkins); Mazda North American Operations; and Mazda America Credit, under the Magnuson-Moss Warranty — Federal Trade Commission Improvement Act (Magnuson-Moss Act) (15 U.S.C. §2310(d)(l) (2000)) and the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) (810 ILCS 5/2—608 (West 2002)). We determine that (1) because plaintiffs were seeking equitable relief, they were not entitled to a jury trial, and (2) they waived their arguments concerning an evidentiary issue at trial. Accordingly, we affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
On December 14, 2001,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Martin v. Heinold Commodities, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1994
- Razor v. Hyundai Motor AmericaIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
- Mydlach v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 2007
- Catania v. LOCAL 4250/5050Appellate Court of Illinois · 2005
- Vincent v. DoebertAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United Community Bank v. Prairie State Bank & TrustAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012
- Franciscan Communities v. HamerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012