Legal Opinion

Razor v. Hyundai Motor America

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 2006No. 98813PublishedCited by 144 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Freeman

Chief Justice Thomas and Justices Fitzgerald, Kilbride, and Carman concurred in the judgment and opinion.

Justice McMorrow dissented from the denial of rehearing, with opinion.

Justice Karmeier dissented from the denial of rehearing, without opinion.

OPINION

This appeal involves the federal Magnuson-Moss Warranty—Federal Trade Commission Improvement Act (Act) (15 U.S.C. § 2301 et seq. (2000)) and the Illinois Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) (810 ILCS 5/1—101 et seq. (West 2000)). The only issues raised concern the propriety of the damages awarded to the plaintiff. The primary question is whether…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Connick v. Suzuki Motor Co., Ltd.Illinois Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Snelson v. KammIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
  3. People v. SteidlIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Midland Hotel Corp. v. Reuben H. Donnelley Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Gill v. FosterIllinois Supreme Court · 1993

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by144 opinions

  1. Deborah Jackson v. Payday Financial, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
  2. Kinkel v. Cingular Wireless, LLCIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
  3. York v. Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical CenterIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Dynegy Marketing and Trade v. Multiut Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  5. Darrell Cannon v. Jon BurgeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014

139 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API